Both devices are able to create electronic maps of the rooms they operate in. Mapping is used by both autonomous vacuum cleaners and AMRs. If the crumbs can’t be collected on the first pass, they can be collected the second time round – nothing is lost, apart from battery life. In contrast, the precision of the vacuum cleaner can be summed up with: try until you succeed.
![Sweeper robot AGV design Sweeper robot AGV design](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81cyArjyLNL._AC_SL1500_.jpg)
That’s why the AMR doesn’t make mistakes. If the robot made mistakes during pickup and delivery at the designated place, it could damage or even destroy the load and endanger the people working nearby. The situation is entirely different in the case of the AMR. This function doesn’t require great precision. The vacuum cleaner collects and transports dust to the docking station in a container with a capacity of about half a litre. The AMR is able to pick up, transport and deliver a load with such precision that it can be entrusted with the transport of electronics and fragile goods (e.g. A cleaning robot’s strategy for overcoming hurdles resembles a small dog constantly wagging its tail, sniffing every obstacle, and running circles around it. a forklift) and continue on its route, an autonomous vacuum cleaner can do none of these things. However, while the AMR can identify a static or a mobile obstacle, independently decide whether it’s better to turn around and choose a different path (because the obstacle looks permanent), or let an incoming vehicle pass (e.g. The similarity is evident – we define a task and indicate where it needs to be done, and the robots perform the functions they were designed for. The vacuum cleaner cleans flat surfaces (collects dust, food crumbs, hair, etc.). The AMR moves loads from point A to point B. Let us have a closer look at a few selected skills of both devices – those which determine whether they can be called autonomous at all. The title of this paragraph defies logic, but it illustrates what happens when we compare “intelligent” vacuum cleaners to autonomous robots quite well. Everything is the same, only completely different The devil, as they say, is in the details. A baseless but understandable opinion, since there are certainly some similarities, such as their function and appearance. Most likely it isn’t always the case, but it’s not difficult to imagine a situation where a demonstration of a warehouse-class AMR is summed up with “my vacuum cleaner can do it too”.
![Sweeper robot AGV design Sweeper robot AGV design](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GAu4lxxAF-Y/maxresdefault.jpg)
Promotion of the latter is directed at specialists, and this means it often falls on deaf ears – it tells experts what they already know, and it also doesn’t use the language of value-based selling that decision-makers are used to. What makes it so easy to compare uncomparable things? The disproportion in the strength and suggestiveness of advertising campaigns of autonomous vacuum cleaners and AMRs is not insignificant. The two are indeed as similar as a tipper truck toy and a 797B Caterpillar truck. As is often the case, one succeeded and now dances on its brush on marble floors and Persian carpets, while the other was less fortunate and transports loads in warehouses and factory halls. At first glance, after watching demonstration videos, you might think that an autonomous vacuum cleaner and an industrial Autonomous Mobile Robot (AMR) are very similar to each other, siblings of sorts.